Sierra Institute
  • What We Do
    • Community Based Natural Resource Management
      • Planning
      • Implementation
      • Collaborative Groups
    • Rural Community Development
      • North State Jobs First
      • High Road Training Partnership
      • Disadvantaged Community and Tribal Involvement Program
      • Drought Relief
      • Sierra Forest Entrepreneurs Program
    • Wood Utilization
      • Mass Timber Housing
      • Indian Valley Wood Utilization Campus
      • Biomass Heat
    • Youth Stewardship
      • P-CREWPlumas Conservation, Restoration, & Education in Watersheds
        Plumas Conservation, Restoration, & Education in Watersheds
  • DONATE
  • About
    • About Us
    • Sierra Institute History
    • Staff and Board
    • Field Staff
    • About Indian Valley
    • Contact Us
  • Job Opportunities
  • NEWSROOM
    • Media
    • Publications
  • What We Do
    • Community Based Natural Resource Management
      • Planning
      • Implementation
      • Collaborative Groups
      • West Shore Project
      • Adult Restoration Crews
    • Rural Community Development
      • North State Jobs First
      • High Road Training Partnership
      • Disadvantaged Community and Tribal Involvement Program
      • Drought Relief
      • Community Build
      • Sierra Forest Entrepreneurs Program
      • Socioeconomic Monitoring
      • Sierra Fellows
    • Wood Utilization
      • Mass Timber Housing
      • Indian Valley Wood Utilization Campus
      • Biomass Heat
    • Youth Stewardship
      • P-CREW
      • Natural Resource Education
  • DONATE
  • About
    • About Us
    • Sierra Institute History
    • Staff and Board
    • Field Staff
    • About Indian Valley
    • Contact Us
  • Job Opportunities
  • NEWSROOM
    • Media
    • Publications

Exploring socioeconomic effects of fire in Amador and Calaveras Counties

December 7, 2018  |  By Sierra Institute Blogs
Picture1

In recent years, California has been experiencing an increase in large fires due to a combination of factors, including drought conditions and a history of fire suppression. We saw this trend continue this summer with the Carr and Mendocino Complex Fires and even more recently this November with the Camp Fire. Fires tend to disproportionately affect rural communities that may already be experiencing economic and ecological hardships. While the Camp Fire was still smoldering 100 miles to the north, I traveled to Calaveras County as part of Sierra Institute’s socioeconomic work for ACCG to learn about the lasting impacts of another catastrophic fire, the Butte Fire, that occurred three years ago.

The Amador Calaveras Consensus Group, or ACCG, is a forest collaborative group whose boundaries encompass Amador and Calaveras Counties as well as parts of El Dorado and Alpine Counties, and include parts of the Stanislaus and Eldorado National Forests. It is one of twenty-three Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Projects, or CFLRs, around the country. The CFLR Program is unique in that it is one of the few natural resource-focused congressional funding programs to require socioeconomic monitoring. ACCG is contracting the Sierra Institute to conduct socioeconomic monitoring and report the results while guiding the group through the process so it can continue monitoring independently in the future.

Socioeconomic monitoring assesses social and economic conditions. It includes quantitative, or numerical, data such as employment rates, income levels, and school enrollment gathered from sources like the US Census. This type of data can show trends and correlations that we supplement with qualitative data, which includes information gathered through interviews with people who live in and have local knowledge about the area.

As an example, the graph above shows the percentage of students enrolled in the Free and Reduced Price Meal Program at public elementary schools in Amador and Calaveras Counties. Someone who is familiar with the area might be able to provide insight into the spike in enrollment at four schools in 2015. We know the Butte Fire occurred around that time but it is difficult if not impossible to establish causation from numbers alone. Stories are powerful and fill in a picture that quantitative data alone cannot capture. So, in November my supervisor Kyle and I headed down to the ACCG area to conduct interviews.

We talked to people who are members of ACCG, as well as people who do not have a direct connection to forest-related activities. We were invited to attend a community lunch in Mountain Ranch, a community heavily affected by the Butte Fire, and talked with residents about their experiences. We heard from some participants about issues similar to those in other rural, forested areas. For example, since mills have closed and timber jobs are no longer available, the major employers are the counties, casinos, hospitals, and the state prison in Ione. Otherwise people commute to Sacramento and other places in the valley or leave the area altogether, deflating the workforce capacity. For those in forest-related industries, fire risk is an important, on-going consideration, and in the burn area the Butte Fire continually comes up as a major factor in current socioeconomic conditions.

The Butte Fire burned 70,868 acres (mostly in Calaveras County and on private, non-industrial land), destroyed 921 structures including 549 homes, and resulted in 2 deaths in September of 2015. Three years later, the aftermath of the Butte Fire is still a shadow over the county. Some people have moved out of the area entirely, unwilling or unable to rebuild. For residents that stayed, living in the fire footprint and seeing the scorched land around them every day takes an emotional toll. In a county with a large retired population, many who live on large plots of land cannot physically clean up their properties themselves and it would be prohibitively expensive to hire a crew to do so, so dead trees still stand on acres upon acres, presenting a continued fire risk. Prospective marijuana growers took advantage of low real estate prices and moved into the area. This would be controversial in the best of circumstances, and the county government has only complicated it by first allowing and then banning marijuana cultivation. Despite these challenges, one positive outcome some interviewees mentioned is that fire tends to bring the community together to help one another.

The Camp Fire seems to have shaken residents of Amador and Calaveras Counties. Some are afraid, as one interviewee put it, of becoming “another Paradise.” With fires like the Butte and Camp Fires, the general public quickly returns to everyday life after the flames are put out and the smoke clears, but for communities in the fire’s path, like Mountain Ranch and Paradise, the process of recovery can be long and difficult. Socioeconomic monitoring may be able to help us understand these lasting social and economic impacts.

By: Hilary Sanders, Natural Resource Social Science Intern

Community Community Well Being Rural Communtities Rural Economies Socioeconomic Monitoring
Previous StoryLandscape level management options for the Baker Cypress
Next StoryCollaborative forest restoration: one response to wildfire

Related Articles

  • lassen-volcanic-national-park-2707438_1280
    Essential Ingredients
  • dr. elizabeth
    The Way of the Future

Sierra Institute on Instragram

Please check the widget data

Popular Posts

  • KIMG3302-1
    Sierra Institute and the Maidu Summit Consortium partner on landscape treatments on the West Shore of Lake Almanor. Thursday, 19, Nov
  • 2016-09-21-14.55.41-300×225
    P-CREW Alumni Reunion Wednesday, 10, Jan
  • Storrie_ColbyCkMdw_1
    The Restoration of Montane Meadows and Forests in the Northern Sierra Nevada Tuesday, 12, Jan
  • Landscape level management options for the Baker Cypress Friday, 7, Sep
  • IMG_0954
    Lassen Volcanic National Park News Release Wednesday, 24, Jul
  • Second House
    Harnessing Your Independence Tuesday, 20, Aug

Categories

Tags

beauty Biomass California climate change Collaboration collaborative Community Community Well Being discussion Ecosystem emotional support Environment Feather RIver Basin Forest forest health forest management forest restoration Healthy Forests land management Learning life Local Investments natural resources nature Nature Rules! research resource management rivers Rural Communities Rural Communtities Rural Economies rural life Rural Voices simple living social capital streams Tribes Urban & Rural Value Added Products watershed Watershed Health west shore project wildfire wildland urban interface wildlife

Archives

  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • August 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017

Help Us Promote Vibrant Rural Communities

DONATE TODAY

P.O. Box 11, 4438 Main Street
Taylorsville, CA 95983

530-284-1022 phone
530-284-1023 fax
info@SierraInstitute.us

© 2025 Sierra Institute